In December, Chris Bach shared her second key
to problem solving: “A dog must be managed so the problem response
will never occur again.” This month we are wrapping up this segment.
Chris discusses the third and fourth keys to problem solving.
KEY NUMBER
THREE: A new, incompatible behavior must be taught
and proofed in a training venue other than the problem
situation.
A new response that
is incompatible to the problem response must be
taught. In other words, the response that is intended to replace
another must have a completely new set of triggering stimuli,
fixation requirements and reinforcement consequences. Unless each of
these criteria is different, the dog can too easily fall back into
the old behavior or behavior pattern.
This new response
will begin as an “operant” one, created through operant
conditioning. It will be a response that is dependent upon its
consequences. And the consequences had better be GOOD. Good enough
for the dog to want to voluntarily offer and rehearse it so that it
eventually becomes a habit. A new habitual behavior is the only type
that can replace a previous, undesirable habitual behavior.
For example, as part
of Kit’s problem solving program for Tiny, she will teach him to sit
and make Eye Contact. But she will not attempt to teach him Eye
Contact at mealtime. She would not make much progress if she tried
to teach Tiny to make Eye Contact during any part of his mealtime
ritual. The phenomenon called “blocking” would prevent Tiny from
learning this new behavior in the presence of a set of stimuli (the
mealtime routine) that previously triggered a completely different
set of behaviors (arousal and defensive actions). However, she will
teach these skills at every other opportune time such as before she
will throw Tiny’s ball, or open a door, or let him greet people.
Along with teaching
these two new skills, it will be necessary to PROOF them. The
PROOFING process will clarify the concept, intensify the conscious
commitment to it through practice and thereby contribute to it
becoming habitual.
To PROOF Tiny on
sitting and making Eye Contact, Kit will require him to perform this
behavior under increasingly difficult circumstances. Sitting and
making Eye Contact to go out the door will be proofed to the point
where Tiny maintains both requirements even when Kit is not looking
at him or she has stepped out the door. Getting in and out of
crates, cars or rooms will require two solid minutes of Eye Contact
before Tiny is released. When he wants his cream cheese filled Kong
or other objects, he will have to sit and make Eye Contact behavior
habitual and self-reinforcing. Tiny will get in the habit of
deferring to Kit’s wishes and out of the habit of
defending his resources.
KEY NUMBER
FOUR: Once the new behavior is habitual, meaning reliable and
self-reinforcing, it can be used to replace the problematic
behavior.
Habitual behaviors
are ones that have been proofed and rehearsed and are totally
reliable under many different circumstances. Only habitual behaviors
can ever be used to replace another habitual behavior.
Kit’s plan is to get
Tiny in the habit of seeing food and immediately sitting and making
Eye Contact to earn it.
She has also
disassembled the doorbell so that signal no longer exists. She has
been practicing that when someone knocks at the door (a brand new
signal); Tiny must sit and make Eye Contact in order to accompany
her to the door. He must then sit and make Eye Contact to earn food
from the visitor. Then he is learning to sit at her feet making Eye
Contact while she visits with her guest. Tiny no longer has a
mealtime because he is getting his diet during these teaching
sessions. Tiny’s dish is gone and he no longer has a feeding spot.
And the doorbell no longer announces guests. Kim has done all the
correct things to assure that Tiny will never again guard his dinner
and has no other opportunities to rehearse habitual
defensiveness.
From now on, anything
that Tiny wants will be earned by ignoring the resource. Instead he
must sit and make Eye Contact with Kim, which is totally
incompatible with guarding or defensive responses.
(c) THE THIRD WAY ~ Chris Bach ~ 2002 -
2003. All rights reserved.